packet capture on Junos operational mode

Packet capture in real time on an interface is performed with the monitor command:

lab@vSRX> monitor traffic interface fxp0 ?
Possible completions:
  <[Enter]>            Execute this command
  absolute-sequence    Display absolute TCP sequence numbers
  brief                Display brief output
  count                Number of packets to receive (0..1000000 packets)
  detail               Display detailed output
  extensive            Display extensive output
  layer2-headers       Display link-level header on each dump line
  matching             Expression for headers of receive packets to match
  no-domain-names      Don't display domain portion of hostnames
  no-promiscuous       Don't put interface into promiscuous mode
  no-resolve           Don't attempt to print addresses symbolically
  no-timestamp         Don't print timestamp on each dump line
  print-ascii          Display packets in ASCII when displaying in hexadecimal format
  print-hex            Display packets in hexadecimal format
  read-file            Read packets from a given file
  resolve-timeout      Period of time to wait for each name resolution (seconds)
  size                 Amount of each packet to receive (bytes)
  write-file           Write packets to specified file
  |                    Pipe through a command
lab@vSRX> monitor traffic interface fxp0 write-file capture01.pcap 
Address resolution is ON. Use <no-resolve> to avoid any reverse lookup delay.
Address resolution timeout is 4s.
Listening on fxp0, capture size 96 bytes

^C
297 packets received by filter
0 packets dropped by kernel

lab@vSRX>

lab@vSRX> file list 

/var/home/lab/:
.lesshst
.ssh/
capture01.pcap
jt /

lab@vSRX> 

Then I open the freeBSD CLI and open the pcap file using tcpdump:

Topology

graph LR
net1(LAN1_172.17.99.0/24) 
net1 <--> R1
R1 <--> |WAN1_10.10.10.8/30|R4

Configuration and Interpretations

Desired outcome: I want to configure a generated route on R1 for the prefix 172.17.99.0. Currently, the prefix 172.17.99.0/24 is directly attached to ge-0/0/6. I want to make R1 advertise the generated route 172.17.96.0/19 toward its BGP neighbor R4 only when R1 receives the BGP route 10.22.1.0/26 from R4 (which is configured as an aggregate route on R4) and successfully imports it from BGP into inet.0. On R1, at the moment there is only one contributing route for the generated route, which is 17.17.99.0/24.

Topology

graph LR
net1(LAN1_172.17.99.0/24) 
net1 <--> R1
R1 <--> |WAN1_10.10.10.8/30|R4

Configuration and Analysis

The default next hop of an aggregate route is reject:

root@R4> show configuration routing-options rib inet.0 aggregate 
defaults {
    preference 189;
}
route 10.22.1.0/26;

root@R4> 
root@R4> show route protocol aggregate 

inet.0: 15 destinations, 17 routes (15 active, 0 holddown, 0 hidden)
+ = Active Route, - = Last Active, * = Both

10.22.1.0/26       *[Aggregate/189] 00:00:58
                       Reject

inet6.0: 3 destinations, 3 routes (3 active, 0 holddown, 0 hidden)

root@R4> 
root@R4> show route 10.22.1.0/26 exact detail 

inet.0: 15 destinations, 17 routes (15 active, 0 holddown, 0 hidden)
10.22.1.0/26 (1 entry, 1 announced)
        *Aggregate Preference: 189
                Next hop type: Reject, Next hop index: 0
                Address: 0x77c5434
                Next-hop reference count: 2
                Kernel Table Id: 0
                State: <Active Int Ext>
                Local AS:    22 
                Age: 7:22 
                Validation State: unverified 
                Task: Aggregate
                Announcement bits (2): 0-KRT 5-Resolve tree 3 
                AS path: I  (LocalAgg)
                Flags:                  Depth: 0        Active
                AS path list:
                AS path: I Refcount: 2
                Contributing Routes (2):
                        10.22.1.0/27 proto Direct
                        10.22.1.32/27 proto Static
                Thread: junos-main 

root@R4> 

#LessonLearned The contributing routes may be of different routing protocols or pseudoprotocols.

Next Hop Values

On R2, verify that there is a BGP route to 1.1.1.1.

user1@R2>
user1@R2> show route 1.1.1.1

inet.0: 15 destinations, 15 routes (15 active, 0 holddown, 0 hidden)
+ = Active Route, - = Last Active, * = Both

1.1.1.1/32         *[BGP/170] 5d 13:58:29, localpref 100
                      AS path: 17 17 17 17 I, validation-state: unverified
                    >  to 10.10.10.1 via ge-0/0/1.0

On R1, configure static route to 10.22.1.32/27 with next-hop 10.10.10.2, preference 6. The ping from R1’s loopback to R2’s 10.22.1.34 interface must succeed. How RIB looks like, when a static route is configured with a next hop set to the IP address of the directly-attached host:

verifying sent and received routes to and from a BGP neighbor

The show route advertising-protocol bgp and show route receive-protocol bgp were my quick way to verify which NLRIs are sent and received with a particular BGP neighbor.

Too much relying on the output of show route advertising-protocol bgp and show route receive-protocol bgp without paying attention to the BGP neighor in the command slowly led me to assume the absence of NLRI exchange between the BGP peers, when the output of those commands is empty. The following example depicts the configuration of iBGP using route reflector technology to build a VXLAN overlay for a leaf-spine topology. Each spine acts as a route reflector to its own client group:

Notes from a Juniper Junos troubleshooting course

Packets reaching the irb interface trigger a routing lookup.

When using vMX, typically in a lab, then there should be two VMs: one for the control plane and one for the forwarding plane, named something like vmx1-vcp and vmx1-vfp respectively.

When pinging the IP address of an aggregate Ethernet interface, the ICMP Echo Reply packets are duplicated:

lab@vEX> ping 172.16.200.2 count 3    
PING 172.16.200.2 (172.16.200.2): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 172.16.200.2: icmp_seq=0 ttl=63 time=3.034 ms
64 bytes from 172.16.200.2: icmp_seq=0 ttl=63 time=3.209 ms (DUP!)
64 bytes from 172.16.200.2: icmp_seq=0 ttl=63 time=3.251 ms (DUP!)
64 bytes from 172.16.200.2: icmp_seq=0 ttl=63 time=3.295 ms (DUP!)
64 bytes from 172.16.200.2: icmp_seq=0 ttl=63 time=3.346 ms (DUP!)
64 bytes from 172.16.200.2: icmp_seq=0 ttl=63 time=3.387 ms (DUP!)
64 bytes from 172.16.200.2: icmp_seq=0 ttl=63 time=3.418 ms (DUP!)
64 bytes from 172.16.200.2: icmp_seq=0 ttl=63 time=3.448 ms (DUP!)
64 bytes from 172.16.200.2: icmp_seq=1 ttl=63 time=3.641 ms
64 bytes from 172.16.200.2: icmp_seq=1 ttl=63 time=3.688 ms (DUP!)
64 bytes from 172.16.200.2: icmp_seq=1 ttl=63 time=3.711 ms (DUP!)
64 bytes from 172.16.200.2: icmp_seq=1 ttl=63 time=3.717 ms (DUP!)
64 bytes from 172.16.200.2: icmp_seq=1 ttl=63 time=3.871 ms (DUP!)
64 bytes from 172.16.200.2: icmp_seq=1 ttl=63 time=3.883 ms (DUP!)
64 bytes from 172.16.200.2: icmp_seq=1 ttl=63 time=3.919 ms (DUP!)
64 bytes from 172.16.200.2: icmp_seq=1 ttl=63 time=3.923 ms (DUP!)
64 bytes from 172.16.200.2: icmp_seq=2 ttl=63 time=2.626 ms

--- 172.16.200.2 ping statistics ---
3 packets transmitted, 3 packets received, +14 duplicates, 0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 2.626/3.492/3.923/0.343 ms

lab@vEX> 

The ‘hot swappable’ and ‘hot pluggable’ are chassis capabilities and are not the same.

Definition

Firewall filters in Juniper Junos are stateless packet filters that act pretty much like the access lists in Cisco IOS, IOS XE and NX-OS. Once configured, they must be assigned in the input or output direction of one or more interfaces to become effective.

Example scenario: preventing ping packets to be initiated from one direction while allowing the other direction

Topology

R1:ge-0/0/5(.1) <— 10.10.7.0/30 —> (.2)ge-0.0.1:R5

Configuration

On R5: